Showing posts with label Gohmert. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gohmert. Show all posts

Friday, February 13, 2009

Democrats Pass $787 Billion Spending Bill

House Dems fail to honor a 48 hour public review agreement

WASHINGTON, DC, Feb. 13, 2009 -- With Republicans crying foul, the House and Senate Democrat majorities today steam-rolled the epic spending bill through, after it had been available for viewing less than 16 hours.

On Tuesday, the House unanimously agreed to delay action on the bill until it had been posted online for viewing at least 48 hours. The 1000 page document was posted last night at 11:00 p.m.

This morning, after only 10 hours of overnight public availability, the House began debate on the bill, and at 2:24 p.m. This afternoon, a passing vote of 248-183 was recorded, just 14 hours after the bill was posted.

Among those complaining about both the fiscal soundness of the measure and the failure to honor the 48 hour review period was Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX).


"The biggest spending bill in the history of the world, and the rule says we can't even have the bill read out loud here on the floor so the.... American people know what we are doing to future generations." Gohmert said, speaking on the floor of the House. "We lost 1,200 in east Texas yesterday. Why? Because the hope and change that people voted for in the President has come to doom and gloom. They have held on to avoid letting their workers go, but now for the last month they have heard the Democratic proposals and what they see is no hope. No hope left in this bill."

Other Republicans pointed to a $50 million line item for the National Endowment for the Arts and $300 million tapped to update the federal auto fleet with more fuel-efficient vehicles as examples of needless spending.

"When you look at some of the spending in this bill, it will do nothing about creating jobs," said House Minority Leader John Boehner.

House Democrats, though, hailed the bill as the kind of swift and bold action that President Barack Obama had called for in his Inaugural Address.

"The American people are feeling a great deal of pain, they have uncertainty about their jobs, about health care, about the ability to pay for the education of their children, and sad to say — in our great country — even the ability to put food on the table." said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. "And so, today, we have passed legislation that does take that “swift, bold action” on their behalf."

In the Senate, voting began late this afternoon. Republican Senators opposed passage strongly, with 38 voting to kill the bill, but three, Arlen Spector (R-PA), Olympia Snowe (R-ME) and Susan Collins (R-ME) voted in favor, giving Democrats the 60 votes needed for passage.

On her vote in favor of the bill, Snowe released a statement this afternoon calling herself a key architect in crafting the $789 billion compromise, and saying the bill is more fiscally sound and will create or retain 3.5 million jobs and provide tax relief for 95 percent of hard-working American families.

"Today, Washington sent a strong signal to the American people that this Congress is, indeed, committed to getting our economy back on the road to recovery," said Senator Snowe. "Facing one of the worst economic downturns in our nation’s history, inaction was not an option. Economists across the ideological spectrum have agreed on one truism – that fiscal stimulus is necessary to provide the positive jolt our economy urgently requires."

Texas Senator John Cornyn (R), taking exception to the debt the bill will cause Texans and the rushed manner in which it was passed, issued the following statement after casting his 'no' vote:

“A stimulus bill would have been a good idea if it had been focused on the right priorities—fixing housing first, providing taxpayers with meaningful, broad-based tax relief and eliminating redundant and ineffective Washington programs. Instead, we saw Democrats in both chambers redefine ‘stimulus’ to mean nearly anything any of them desired. Many programs in the bill are wasteful and unnecessary. The bill will use taxpayer money for things like golf carts, art projects and company cars for federal employees.

“While proponents like to highlight that the bill will provide Texas with $10 billion in government programs, the bill spends money we don’t have—in fact, Texans’ share of the national debt will increase by $90 billion. This doesn’t seem like a good deal to me.

“As a staunch advocate of open government and transparency, I take serious issue with the fact that Members of Congress and the American public had less than 24 hours to look at the conference report before the final vote."

Senate passage is anticipated late tonight, when Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH), is expected to provide the 60th vote needed for passage. Brown, returning to Washington after attending the funeral of his mother, was expected to arrive about 10:30 p.m.

Assuming Brown casts his vote as expected, the final vote count in the Senate would be 60-38. All 38 'no' votes came from Republicans.

In the House passage of the bill, no Republican representatives voted for passage. Seven Democrats crossed party lines to vote against the bill.

Obama won't get to claim the bipartisan support he had hoped for, but he can a claim a victory. The bill could be on his desk as early as tomorrow.

Read More...

Gohmert: Geithner's Plan "Insufficient", Lacks Solutions

Texas Rep. renews call for his own 'tax holiday' plan to stimulate the economy

WASHINGTON, DC, Feb. 12, 2009 -- Representative Louie Gohmert (R-TX) Thursday joined numerous critics of Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner's plan to spend upwards of $2 trillion dollars in an attempt to stimulate our flagging economy, slamming the plan for it's lack of detailed solutions.

Testifying before Congress Tuesday and Wednesday, Geithner revealed that his financial stabilization plan might cost around $2 trillion, that being in addition to the $790 billion that Congress appropriated for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) last year. However, he provided scant details about how the money would be spent, or how toxic assets would be purchased or handled.

Markets in the U.S. and around the world reacted negatively on the news. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell about 330 points Tuesday as word of the eye-popping proposal reached traders. The broad consensus of fund managers and bankers was that the plan lacked sufficient detail and specificity to allow the markets to make an educated judgment about its chances of success.


Geithner attempted to quiet critics during a second day of testimony Wednesday.

“I understand the desire for details and I understand the disappointment about the lack of details,” Geithner said. "But part of the disappointment is because people were hoping that we do things that, in my judgment, would have been too generous and not responsible for the taxpayers’ money.”

But in a statement released Thursday calling the Geithner plan vague and disappointing, Gohmert said the new Treasury Secretary was playing follow the leader behind Henry Paulson, the previous Treasury Secretary under President Bush.

"We must take very seriously the economic challenges facing our nation, and in the process of seeking solutions, one of our top priorities should be accountability to the American people. However, some arrogant leaders in Washington have forsaken this essential principle, believing the federal government knows all and controls all, recklessly forging ahead with failed policies that impose tremendous and increasing risk to Americans.

“Sec. Geithner openly admitted that his predecessor’s policy “was always behind the curve,” and “added to public anxiety and to investor uncertainty.” Yet in the same breath he unveiled his own so-called ‘plan’ that’s no plan at all, but rather a continuation of Paulson’s doomed design and an ambiguous outline that leaves Americans and investors without answers. But even without crucial details, our taxpayers, citizens, and Wall Street know enough to be able to discern that the government’s spending rampage and continued meddling is wrong, and they will not go along with Geithner’s game of follow the leader."

Gohmert, who has been pushing a two month tax holiday as an alternative method of stimulus, used his comments about Geithner's plan to renew his call

“There are more effective solutions that guarantee Americans immediate relief through free market solutions. My proposal for a two month federal tax holiday serves as an alternative to the bailout and has gained overwhelming support from across the country.

"It does not require new government spending in this time when every penny counts, and it puts money earned by taxpayers immediately and directly back in their hands. Individuals will be able to catch up financially and stimulate ailing industries by paying of mortgages and credit card debt, buying more efficient vehicles, investing in stock deals, remodeling homes, having enough cash to effectively refinance, buying long delayed but needed purchases, and spending it where we need it most.

"What is more, it will help them return to having some semblance of confidence in the economy again, which is one of the most critical needs in this nation.

“It is imperative that Americans contact their representatives, senators, and the White House to let them know they want to be the ones to decide on the recipients of their own hard-earned money through this tax holiday before Geithner squanders and demands even more.”

Read More...

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Gohmert Pushes For Taxpayer Bailout

Proposing an alternate means of jump starting the nation's economy, Rep. Louis Gohmert is advocating a two month tax holiday.

His plan would use the remaining 350 billion of the $750 billion bailout fund to grant a two month period in which no federal taxes would be collected. Fiscal conservatives are climbing on the band wagon, but the plan faces opposition in the democratically controlled House of Representatives.

Gohmert faced tough questions today about his plan from conservative bloggers who met with him today at the Heritage Foundation.

Most wanted to know why Gohmert was pushing a short-term tax holiday rather than a long-term solution such as cutting capital gains or reducing corporate taxes. Gohmert said it boiled down to political reality. With Democrats controlling 256 seats in the House, there’s little Republicans can do to enact long-term tax relief.


Heritage.org has the story.

Read More...

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Louie Gohmert Trounces Owen 87-12%

Louie Gohmert easily defeated Roger Owen, but his biggest fight will be next year in Washington.

Louie Gohmert never broke a sweat this campaign season. Roger Owen trailed him by a large margin the whole race, and never threatened to break the pattern. Gohmert has little cause to celebrate beyond his personal victory, however.

Nationwide, Republicans gave up at least 10 seats to Nancy Pelosi's Democrats. This means Gohmert and party are probably in for a long two year turn in the congressional barrel.

It will also be two years of party convulsions, with republicans seeking leadership, a message that will resonate with a reshaped electorate, and a strategy to stop the bleeding that started in 2002.

While Barack Obama, Harry Reid and Pelosi all made bi-partisan overtures in their speeches tonight, early budget and energy battles next year will no doubt strain the outreach.

Gohmert's party also faces fund raising woes. The RNC nearly bankrupted itself trying to hold onto a fillibuster capability in the senate. Their weakened political power, coupled with hard financial times ahead for donors, will probably mean lighter war chests in two years.

The Democrats, enjoying near total control over the halls of power in the Capital, will find their donors eager to pony up, hoping for a piece of the massive programs Obama and the Democrats have promised.

Read More...

Design by Dzelque Blogger Templates 2008

The Upshur Advocate - Design by Dzelque Blogger Templates 2008

Site Meter